Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6363 14
Original file (NR6363 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
EROTMENT OF THE RAYY

tl

_

7Ot S, COURTHOUSE RUAU, Burt ive
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

HD
Docket No. NR6363-14

On Tawra ass OAT

we See y — eae

From: Chairman, Board for Correction cf Naval Records
TO; Secretary of the Navy

) is

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: fa) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 22 Apr 14 w/attachments
{2} HOMC MIO memo dtd 6 Jan 15
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative
Remarks (1070)") entry dated 29 July 2013 (copy at Tab 2).

2. Tae Board, consisting of |i
MMM, «72-2 ewed Petitioner's allegat: a \ i

22 Ganuary 2015, and pursuant to e , aetermines that
Lhe corrective action indi¢gated below si taken on the
available evidence of record. Document ial considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
Statutes, requlations and policies.

m
3
fy
4H
a
a
i
ct
mb ow
K

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence at enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine
Corps office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's
case has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence
of an error warranting the following corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the
service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”") entry dated
29 July 2013. This is to be accomplished by physically removing the
page 11 on which the entry appears, or completely obliterating the
entry so it cannot be read, rather than merely lining through it.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregcing is a true
and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

0 Fo 7” -
aT A epteHri
JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of
the Navy.

-

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2570 14

    Original file (NR2570 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on & January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (4) and (5), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5935 14

    Original file (NR5935 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page ll ("Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 5 March 2013 and. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6512 13

    Original file (NR6512 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 10 December 2012 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bey, Chapman and Green, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 October 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8361 13

    Original file (NR8361 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 30 September 2013 with his rebuttal of the same date (neither of which is in his Official Military Personnel File) and 10 October 2013 with his rebuttal of the same date (copies at Tab A). The Board, consisting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10191 12

    Original file (10191 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry dated 13 September 2011 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Genteman and Marquez and Ms. Zivnuska, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 March 2013, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 12640 12

    Original file (12640 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Gorenflo and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 January 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ") entry dated 5 August >010 and his undated rebuttal. d. That any material directed to be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11847 12

    Original file (11847 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 27 October 2012 and his rebuttal of the same date, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Ms. Zivnuska and Messrs. Genteman and Marquez, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7865 14

    Original file (NR7865 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMEW?T OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred tc as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070}") entries dated 15 October 2013 {copy at Tab A) and 8 April 2014 (copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Polk and Messrs. Exnicios and Grover, reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5893 13

    Original file (NR5893 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11b (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”") entry dated 6 July 2012 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bey, Chapman and Green, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 October 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06852-12

    Original file (06852-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry 8 February 2005, the page 11 entry dated 4/7/05 regarding violation of Article 128 (Uniform Code of Military Justice), and the page lla entry...